Locomore

Locomore was the best-known attempt to take on the market leader in German long-distance rail with its own brand. Financed through crowdfunding, run by partners, and continued by a foreign operator after its insolvency: hardly any other case shows so clearly that brand and operator are two different things.

Also known as: Locomore GmbH & Co. KG · LOC · Crowdfunding-Bahn

GermanyGermanyBrands & service brands9 min read

2016

first train under this name

Open Access

open-access, without a public service contract

1

axis, not a network

0

own trains in today's timetable

Key takeaways

  • Locomore was a brand, not an operator. The train was run by partner companies with their own licences.
  • The brand outlived its company. After the insolvency, another operator continued the service under this name.
  • Open-access means full risk. With no commissioning authority, the company bears every shortfall in demand itself.
  • Second-hand coaches defined the look – refurbished coaches of varying origin in a uniform livery.
  • Every sighting is historical. Without a date, it's no longer possible to establish who was running the train at the time.
Contents
  1. 1.Fact file
  2. 2.Business areas
  3. 3.Structure & brands
  4. 4.History at a glance
  5. 5.How to recognise the company
  6. 6.Strengths and weaknesses
  7. 7.A train nobody had commissioned
  8. 8.Who actually ran trains under this name?
  9. 9.What the train looked like – and why
  10. 10.Four layers in a single train
  11. 11.Where the train could be seen
  12. 12.How reliable is an old sighting?
  13. 13.What the case tells you about the market
  14. 14.Conclusion
  15. 15.Frequently asked questions

Fact file

What it wasLong-distance brand operating open-access, without a public service contract
Distinctive featureSeed funding through a public crowdfunding campaign
Operationsrun by partner companies – the brand owned the train, not the operation
Train formationLocomotive with refurbished second-hand coaches, not a multiple unit
Service profileone north–south axis with few stops instead of a network
After the insolvencycontinued by a foreign operator, sold through a third-party brand
Current statusno ongoing service under this name – the brand lives on as a case study
Official websitelocomore.eu/en

Business areas

Open-access long-distance service – one line at the operator's own economic risk, without public commissioning
Crowdfunding – seed capital from a broadly based crowdfunding campaign
Second-hand vehicle procurement – refurbished coaches instead of a new-build fleet
Contracted-out operations – paths, staff and traction were bought in from partners
Product differentiation – themed coaches as a counter-model to standard long-distance service

Structure & brands

Locomore GmbH & Co. KG – the company behind the brand until the insolvency
Partner railway operators – the various companies that actually ran the train
Successor operator – a foreign railway operator continued the service

History at a glance

2016After a public funding campaign, the first train under the name Locomore starts on a north–south axis across Germany.
2017A few months after launch, the company files for insolvency. Operations are initially suspended.
2017A foreign operator takes over and continues the service; tickets are sold through the sales platform of another long-distance operator.
2020In the wake of the massive collapse in passenger traffic, service under this name ends. It is not resumed.
todayThe brand is more present as a case study than as a service on offer – it stands for the difficulties of open market access in long-distance rail.

How to recognise Locomore

Does the train really belong to Locomore?

Tick off everything that applies to the vehicle in front of you.

  • No current train carries this name – every sighting is historical and needs a date
  • Loco-hauled train with coaches rather than a multiple unit – unusual for modern long-distance service
  • Refurbished second-hand coaches of varying origin in a uniform livery
  • Red base colour with light lettering – the early appearance before the takeover
  • Borrowed locomotive in its own colour scheme – the traction never came from the company's own fleet
  • Few stops on a long axis – the counter-model to a comprehensive network

Strengths and weaknesses

What the company stands for

  • A clearly bounded historical period – sightings can be dated precisely
  • The unusual train formation still makes archive photos recognisable today
  • The case explains in one example how brand, railway operator and keeper can diverge
  • Second-hand coaching stock often has a well-documented history

Where it falls short

  • There's nothing left to spot – this page is context, not a spotting guide
  • There's hardly any reliable public compilation for vehicle attribution
  • Whoever ran the brand changed several times within a short period
  • Old entries in sighting lists are practically unresolvable without a date
  • Confusion with the successor sales partner is widespread

Updated: August 2026 – Some brands you can no longer spot but should still know. Locomore is one: a crowdfunded long-distance train that went insolvent after a few months, kept running under someone else’s management, was sold through a third-party platform, and finally disappeared altogether. This short story contains every layer that this section otherwise has to painstakingly untangle.

Save historical sightings while you can still place them

Old photos without a date lose their value. With Traintrack you file them properly – number, place, moment.

Download Traintrack on the App Store4.8(23 ratings) Get Traintrack on Google Play4.4(35 ratings)

A train nobody had commissioned

German long-distance rail works differently from local service, and that difference is the key to understanding this case. In local service, a commissioning authority tenders out services, pays for them, and sets the timetable and often the livery too. In long-distance rail there’s none of that: anyone who wants to run there buys a path, puts a train on it, and lives off what the passengers pay. The legal framework for this is set at European level and open to any licensed operator – hence the term open access.

That’s exactly where Locomore came in. The idea: its own axis with a distinctive product, financed not by investors but through a public campaign in which many individuals took part with small contributions. The train wasn’t meant to stand out on price alone, but through a different feel to travelling: themed coaches, a clearly recognisable look, a deliberately narrow offer instead of a network.

1axis instead of a network
0commissioning authorities that ordered this service
3parties: brand, operator, vehicle keeper
4years between the first and last train

Who actually ran trains under this name?

The honest answer is: several, one after another – and never the brand itself. From the very start, operations lay with a partner company holding its own licence, because a licence as a railway operator isn’t something you pick up on the side. It requires safety management, staff, workshop access and evidence that a young sales company can’t build up in a few months.

After the insolvency, this separation became even clearer. A foreign operator continued the service – in Germany through Leo Express Global as the company, with Leo Express as its origin. Tickets were sold through the platform of FlixTrain. Which meant the train was: a brand from Germany, an operator from Czechia, sales run by a third company, and a locomotive belonging to a fourth.

Without a date, a sighting like this is lost

For brands whose operator changes within a few months, the date isn't extra information, it's the key. An entry "Locomore, Berlin" can no longer be resolved; "Locomore, Berlin, May 2017" can.

What the train looked like – and why

Look at the locomotive separately

The traction came from the hire market. The loco's colour and keeper marking had nothing to do with the brand and changed over time.

Read the coaches as individual pieces

Refurbished second-hand coaches of varying origin, uniformly liveried. The build and window layout reveal their history.

Note the train formation

The order and number of coaches is a strong identifying feature on trains like this and changes less often than the locomotive.

Record numbers, not names

The twelve-digit number stays on the vehicle even after it's later sold and repainted – see reading the UIC number.

Note down the context

Date, station, track and train number turn a nice photo into a usable sighting.

Four layers in a single train

Layer Who that was How to recognise it How stable
Brand Locomore Lettering and livery of the coaches outlived the company
Sales for a time, a third-party platform Booking route, ticket print changed after the insolvency
Lead railway operator partner company, later a foreign operator Timetable listing, operating documents changed several times
Vehicle keeper, locomotive hire company or partner operator Data panel of the locomotive changed during operation
Vehicle keeper, coaches owner of the second-hand coaches Data panel of the coaches most stable

This table is the real reason this page exists. No other German case shows so compactly that a train isn’t one company, but a construction made up of several. Anyone who has once seen through this structure will be considerably more careful with other services before saying “that’s a train run by …”.

Where the train could be seen

The route followed a classic north–south axis with few stops in major cities. Anyone wanting to photograph it at the time found the best opportunities at terminal and hub stations, because the hauling locomotive was accessible there and the train stood long enough. Stuttgart Hauptbahnhof and Berlin Hauptbahnhof marked the ends, with intermediate stops at major hubs such as Frankfurt Hauptbahnhof in between.

The exact stops were adjusted several times over the short operating period – another reason why a sighting without a date isn’t much help. Out on the open line, by contrast, the train was hardly distinguishable from other loco-hauled passenger trains unless you looked at the coaches in detail. Anyone searching through old folders today should therefore filter for station shots first and only then for line shots; the hit rate is considerably higher. How to build up such an archive systematically is described in the guide to the sighting log.

Sort your archive before the memory fades

Traintrack turns loose photos and notes into a searchable record with date and vehicle number.

Download Traintrack on the App Store4.8(23 ratings) Get Traintrack on Google Play4.4(35 ratings)

How reliable is an old sighting?

What's actually in your old note?

For historical brands, it's not memory that decides but what you actually wrote down at the time.

The date carries more weight here than anything else – for a brand with several operators it's the only anchor.

What the case tells you about the market

Open access tends to work when …

  • a high-demand axis is served without dense competition
  • vehicles can be procured cheaply and flexibly
  • sales has reach without needing to be built up from scratch

It gets tight when …

  • the timetable only allows a few runs a day
  • the train formation depends on hired locomotives
  • operations and brand sit with different companies

It fails regularly when …

  • demand collapses seasonally and there are no reserves
  • path and maintenance costs stay fixed while revenue doesn't
  • an external shock hits passenger traffic as a whole

The difference between this model and commissioned local service is described in more detail in the article local versus long-distance service – it also explains why operator changes happen in an orderly way in local service and abruptly in long-distance rail.

Be careful with borrowed information

Many forums and lists carry attributions from this period that were never verified. Don't copy them unchecked into your own archive. What you saw and noted yourself is reliable; everything else belongs marked as a source reference, not as your own sighting.

Conclusion

Locomore is no longer a spotting target today, but a textbook case. The name was on the coaches, someone else ran the train, a third party sold the tickets, and the locomotive again belonged to someone else. This exact splitting-up is the normal case in the European rail system – it just rarely comes together this briefly and this clearly as it does here.

Anyone holding photos from this period should organise them while the date and circumstances can still be reconstructed. In ten years that will be far harder, and the vehicles themselves will long since be running elsewhere.

In short

A brand with no operation of its own that outlived its company and was afterwards run by third parties. For archive sightings, two pieces of information count: date and vehicle number.

Turn old photos into a real collection

With Traintrack you bring historical and current sightings together in one record – structured, searchable, dated.

Download Traintrack on the App Store4.8(23 ratings) Get Traintrack on Google Play4.4(35 ratings)

Summary

  • The case shows, in a short space of time, every layer this section otherwise has to untangle: brand, company, lead railway operator and vehicle keeper.
  • Open market access exists legally, but is a tough business economically – that's the real lesson.
  • Anyone with photos from this period should tag them with date and vehicle number while the memory still holds.
  • Today the brand is above all a reference case against which other services can be measured.

Frequently asked questions

Does Locomore still run today?

No. No train runs under this name any more; service ended amid the collapse in passenger traffic in the early 2020s and was never resumed. Sightings from this period are therefore purely historical and should always be logged with a date. Anyone seeing a similarly formed train today is very likely looking at a different service.

Who actually ran the trains?

Not the brand owner itself. Operations lay with partner railway operators holding their own licences; after the insolvency, a foreign operator from the orbit of Leo Express took over, represented in Germany by Leo Express Global. Who ran a specific service can only be reconstructed from the date and vehicle number.

What did FlixTrain have to do with it?

After the takeover, tickets were sold through the sales platform of FlixTrain, while the train's operations lay with the successor operator. That's a particularly clear case of the layers separating: sales, brand and operations lay with three different parties. Constellations exactly like this are what produce entries in sighting lists that can no longer be resolved later.

What does crowdfunding mean for a railway?

It means that part of the start-up capital came from many small contributions by private individuals rather than banks or investors. For running a railway, that changes nothing about the requirements: licensing, safety management, path booking and staffing stay the same. The model lowers the barrier to entry for financing, not for regulation – and that's exactly where part of the later difficulties lay.

Why do open-access services fail so often in long-distance rail?

Because they carry the entire economic risk. Unlike local service, where a commissioning authority orders and pays for the service, there's no safety net here: every poorly filled run is a direct loss. On top of that come high fixed costs for paths, vehicles and staff, plus a competitor running a dense timetable in the shape of DB Fernverkehr.

Which vehicles were used?

The train consisted of a hired main-line locomotive and refurbished second-hand coaches. Typical hauling locomotives in open-access long-distance service are machines from the TRAXX and Vectron families, occasionally also second-hand express locomotives such as the Class 101. There's no publicly citable, fully verified record of which machines were actually used at the time.

How do I recognise Locomore photos in an old archive?

By the combination of a loco-hauled train, uniformly liveried but structurally mismatched coaches, and a hauling locomotive in a completely different colour scheme. The coach order is also a useful clue, since it differs noticeably from standard formations on trains like this – how to read it is explained in the article on coach order.

Can I reconstruct a past journey afterwards?

Partly, if you have the date, an approximate time and the location. From that you can place the journey in time and match it against photos or notes. The article reconstructing a train journey afterwards describes the approach; without a date, though, it quickly turns into guesswork.

Where did the route run?

On a continuous north–south axis between the south-west and Berlin, with few stops in major cities. Hub stations such as Stuttgart Hauptbahnhof, Frankfurt Hauptbahnhof and Berlin Hauptbahnhof lay on or near this axis. The exact route was adjusted several times over the short operating period.

Is the brand still worth it as a subject for spotters?

Not as a sighting target, but very much as a reference case. Anyone who has understood how brand, sales, operator and vehicle keeper diverged here will also place today's services correctly, and faster. The guide Who's actually running this train? starts from exactly this point.

Log vehicles from Locomore

Company, vehicle, location and date logged in seconds – and visible to the community.

Download Traintrack on the App Store4.8(23 ratings)Get Traintrack on Google Play4.4(35 ratings)

The operational level in the railway operator database

Who actually runs the trains, with keeper markings and identifying features on the vehicle.

Typical vehicles

Where you will find Locomore

Spotting locations where you will regularly come across vehicles from this organisation – with viewpoints, the best light and coordinates.

All spotting locations in Europe →

More companies

Related guides from the blog

TT

Traintrack editorial team

This database covers the company and brand level of the railway. Group structures, shareholdings and transport contracts change all the time – confirmed details are in the fact file, and anything subject to change is marked as such. Who actually runs the trains is covered in the railway operator database.

← All brands & service brands